· Produces vibrant, detailed color photos · Dries instantly · Won’t smear or smudge · Glossy surface delivers a brilliant shine · Works in with Kodak, Canon, HP, Epson, Brother, Dell and Lexmark inkjet printers · 66 lb. paper
Manufacturer | - |
---|---|
Brand | Kodak |
Item model number | 8360513 |
Color | White |
Weight | - |
Height | - |
Depth | - |
Product Id | 402868 |
---|---|
User Reviews and Ratings | 4.4 (18 ratings) 4.4 out of 5 stars |
UPC | 041778360514 |
# | Title | Reviews | User Ratings | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
Search on Amazon
Price:
Search
on
|
Search
on
|
||
2 |
Kodak 8.5” x 11” Premium Photo Paper – Gloss - 50 Sheets/Pack
Reviews: 18
Ratings:
(18)
Price:
$25.89
on
|
18 | (4.4) |
$25.89
on
|
This paper was selected because of the name Kodak which I associate with the term quality. The paper did not disappoint. It has a beautiful glossy finish. My prints look wonderful on this paper and I will continue to purchase this specific paper.
This paper gives consistently clear images with excellent color. We use it for our business photos and also our personal pictures.
I have a Kodak printer and combined with this photo paper , I have always had great quality products.
We have an HP printer and the Kodak photo paper works just fine. I make photo prints on a regular basis and I find this paper to be perfect for my needs. Not too heavy, not too light, not too glossy and not too expensive if purchased at Walmart.
Worked well for my needs - I hate glossy and reflective paper, so this was just right!
Good quality
Being very picky about the quality of the photos I needed to produce, this paper was outstanding! Although its expensive, Walmart was the cheapest around.
A little lighter than i expected. But good colors for photos.
My printer type is in the HP 4400 series and the paper just will not work with my printer. It paper jams every single time. I think maybe the paper too heavy for the printer? Disappointed I can't use the paper because the paper quality looks like it could be excellent.
very very disappointed not the same paper as shown in the picture said 9mil and was only 8.5mil