"Fit: RelaxedRise: MidFront Rise: 11\"Leg: StraightLeg Opening: 17 1/2\"Front Closure: Zip-Fly with button closure"
Manufacturer | - |
---|---|
Brand | Wrangler |
Item model number | - |
Color | Other |
Weight | - |
Height | - |
Depth | - |
Product Id | 2157085 |
---|---|
User Reviews and Ratings | 3 (1 ratings) 3 out of 5 stars |
UPC | 672787104990 |
# | Title | Reviews | User Ratings | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
Search on Amazon
Price:
Search
on
|
Search
on
|
||
2 |
Wrangler Men's Five Star Premium Carpenter Jean in Dark Vintage
Price:
$19.83
on
|
(3.8) |
$19.83
on
|
These jeans are perfect for me to work on dressdown day
Our youngest son loves them. Wrangler is his favorite brand.
I weld do carpentry and everyday ranch work in these jeans. Love them!
The jeans are very comfortable. I got relaxed fit and they are perfect. The pockets are spacious. I would recommend them to anyone.
Nice. Fit. And good quality!!!
I wish these came in a 35" waist. The 34" is too tight after multiple washes and the 37" is too loose.
The jeans are a good quality and fit well. BUT. The pictures showed a "phone pocket" below the hammer loop on the left leg. The jeans I received had no such pocket. The two "tool pockets" on the right leg are not quite wide enough to hold a phone. Being able to carry a phone conveniently in a pocket was why I ordered these as a replacement for a pair I had worn out. The worn out pair had a phone pocket on the left leg and I could, barely, get my phone into either pocket on the right leg
Stop making pants for fat people who want to believe they're smaller than they really are & make my size 30-30 really 30-30! You've done it before. Do it again. I have 10 year old wrangler carpenter jeans that fit great, but your new ones are two sizes larger.
Was expecting the old style khaki canvas carpenter pants and received a product with "Flex" in the title. Material was thin and stretchy...not what I ordered.
They are way longer and looser then the pair I usually get, I thought they would be the same, but they wasn't